Hi all, I don't like the new keyword. Could we do "stdcomp" (for "standard compliant") or something like that? When a keyword allows a question mark, I would even add that, i.e.. like "stdcomp?". Or when we like to go with interp then at least add "std", i.e. "stdinterp". "interp" alone to me is too near to "interpreter" and could collide with searches should there be an interpreter in the gcc suite.
Sorry, for the new way in the discussion. - Andre On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:00:47 -0800 Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/9/25 1:07 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Hello world, > > > > looking at a few Fortran bug reports, I found some cases where > > it was not clear if the program in question was standard-conforming > > or not. I would propose to add a keyword for that, tentatively > > called "interp". > > > > Comments? Suggestions for a different name? Should I just go ahead > > and create it? > > > > Best regards > > > > Thomas > > Your suggestion is reasonable and it happens often enough to be useful. > It does not have to be an official interpretation needed necessarily. > Sometimes we resolve these via discussion and comparison to other compilers. > > -- Jerry -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
