Hi Paul,

when the testcase adds a new way, that is not tested yet, then please add it.
Otherwise I'd say there are already enough tests in the suite making it run for
a long time.

Did you try how easy the backport is? When it simply applies, then I'd say, do
it. If you experience major issues, then I would not do it. Breaking 14 may be
worse then asking two customers to proceed to 15.

So far my voice. Other opinions highly welcome.

- Andre

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:35:34 +0000
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> This PR was fixed by the patch for PR109066. I have had the attached
> testcase in my tree for more than a week now and I propose to push it
> tomorrow, unless there are any objections.
>
> The reporter has requested that the patch be backported. Neither PR is a
> regression and component defined assignment is so wrongly implemented that
> it will have to be reworked in 16. However, I am perfectly prepared to do
> the backport, which should keep at least two customers happy :-) Thoughts?
>
> Regards
>
> Paul


--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de

Reply via email to