Oh, that explains it then... and how unfortunate >From Gordon's comment, I assumed we were going to stop including the version.properties file (at least for now). That was exactly what I was about to commit, but it seems I still don't have access to the svn repository.
I'm not that much into the code yet, but maybe the way the ant task invokes compc makes those commands take precedence as shown in http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=compilers_12.html#153670. Maybe adding 'append="true"' in the config file could prevent this from happening? In any case, it would be worth looking into checkintests to see what is missing there. 2012/12/7 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > > > On 12/7/12 8:07 AM, "Chema Balsas" <jbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In the meantime, I noticed that spark.swc weights around 80kb more if > > version.properties is not included which strikes me as quite odd... this > > doesn't happen for rpc or spark_dmv. Is there a reason for this? > Something > > we should look into? > Unfortunately, I have the answer, having just spent several hours last > night > and this morning trying to figure out why a simple HelloWorld was no longer > working. > > Both the build.xml and the compile-config.xml were specifying include-file > (the build.xml was specifying version.properties, and compile-config was > specifying defaults.css and more) and it appears that when you do that, the > build.xml wins and the include-file in compile-config gets ignored. This > caused spark.swc to not have its defaults.css in it causing my Helloworld > app to die. > > Interestingly, checkintests somehow passed, which it shouldn't have, so I > am > going to investigate that now. > > I'm not going to check in my fix. Please figure out what you want to do > about version.properties and then make sure all of the include-files are > specified in only one of build.xml or compile-config.xml > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
