Hey Chema
In the follwing compile-config.xml is the version.properties included.
rpc
spark
spark_dmv
<include-file>
<name>version.properties</name>
<path>../../version.properties</path>
</include-file>
In my builded flex sdk it does not exists. Is that part really used or
can it be removed? Or does anyone know how this version.properties is
generated?
Cyrill
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Cyril Thanks for noticing!
>
> @Gordon You're welcome! I'm really happy to see all this movement around
> Falcon/FalconJS lately :)
>
>
> 2012/12/1 Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>
>
>> Oops! Thank you @Chema!
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:09 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" <cyrill.za...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Gordon
>> >
>> >> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml
>> files so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that compile each
>> SDK SWC.
>> >
>> > That wasn't me .. I think that work was done by Chema Balsas (see [1]).
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml
>> files so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that compile each
>> SDK SWC.
>> >>
>> >> Now that we have one such test - for compiling framework.swc - passing,
>> would anybody like to work on investigating the status of other tests that
>> compile rpc.swc, mx.swc, spark.swc, etc.? We need to figure out whether the
>> SDK source code needs to change because Falcon is pickier than the old
>> compiler, or whether Falcon has AS bugs that need to be fixed.
>> >>
>> >> - Gordon
>> >>
>>
