Bogdan, Please look at [1]. It tells you that you need to fill in an ICLA [2] and send it to 'secret...@apache.org'. The secretary will inform the PPMC when you ICLA has been processed. Meanwhile you can create a JIRA ticket [3] with all relevant information and attach your donation to it. This will make it available to everyone to review it.
Once all the formalities have been completed and the review doesn't bring up anything dramatic, I'm sure the code will be added to the SVN repo sooner rather than later. Thank you! EdB 1: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas 2: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt 3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Bogdan DINU <flex.programm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project, > the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs > alike framework which they wanted to support being opened). > > I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm > definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought > them to the community attention in the first place. > > Looking forward to know about the necessary steps. > > Best regards, > Bogdan > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS > <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > >> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its >> feedback. >> >> Thank's guys. >> >> >> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui >> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM >> >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: New Spark components >> >> >> >> >> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work >>>> >>> >>> How does it happen ? >>> >> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter >> had >> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away, so >> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them. >> >> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and >> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course, in >> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and >> address it before committing it. >> >> >>> - Fred. >>> >>> -----Message d'origine----- >>> From: Alex Harui >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM >>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: New Spark components >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at >>>>> this >>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed, >>>>> I >>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s >>>>> the >>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it >>>> work >>>> done for someone else/a company? >>>> >>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for >>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership >>> of all of this work. >>> >>>> >>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been >>>> added >>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other >>>> namespaces >>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Justin >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >> > > > -- > http://www.badu.ro -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
