On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>
> How does it happen ?
There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter had
to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away, so
if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course, in
your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
address it before committing it.
>
> - Fred.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
>
>
>
> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at
>>> this
>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed,
>>> I
>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>> the
>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>
>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it work
>> done for someone else/a company?
> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership
> of all of this work.
>>
>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>> added
>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>> namespaces
>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>> 1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
