Hi, I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project, the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought them to the community attention in the first place. Looking forward to know about the necessary steps. Best regards, Bogdan On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its > feedback. > > Thank's guys. > > > -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: New Spark components > > > > > On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, >> >> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work >>> >> >> How does it happen ? >> > There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter > had > to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away, so > if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them. > > You should also review the code before committing to the code base and > handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course, in > your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and > address it before committing it. > > >> - Fred. >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> From: Alex Harui >> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: New Spark components >> >> >> >> >> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at >>>> this >>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed, >>>> I >>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s >>>> the >>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ? >>>> >>> >>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it >>> work >>> done for someone else/a company? >>> >> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for >> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership >> of all of this work. >> >>> >>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been >>> added >>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other >>> namespaces >>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >>> >>> 1. >>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt> >>> >> > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > -- http://www.badu.ro
