On 21/11/12 23:29, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> I took a different approach. Instead of relying on generic compiler, my >> goal is to implement a framework with a consistent set of rules, in >> native languages and platforms. >> Feel a gap in missing feature territory and encapsulate it in one place. >> On top of that very abstract scripting language can be developed as >>well. >For me, AS3 is the key factor. If you make folks learn a new language, it >makes their set of choices much wider. >
I Agree, I also think AS3 => JS is the only real option we should pursue if we want to maintain momentum on Flex for the wider audience of Flex developers. They don't want to write in a new language because the chance is higher that they will not choose Flex in that case. AS3 + MXML is key, the output can vary (JS, SWF, ..) >
