Apology for feel instead of fill a gap ;)
So once again, this is it, room of interpreters instead force people to
learn Esperanto.
the phrase 'For disposal of native speakers' could only attract more people.
But the Flex itself as a framework should fill that gap imho. Make it
more abstract, platform independent and preserve already accepted
methodology.
Is it possible to make it happen by implementing Flex in native
platforms directly as a bare-bones?
Dan
On 11/21/2012 10:40 PM, Fréderic Cox wrote:
On 21/11/12 23:29, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
I took a different approach. Instead of relying on generic compiler, my
goal is to implement a framework with a consistent set of rules, in
native languages and platforms.
Feel a gap in missing feature territory and encapsulate it in one place.
On top of that very abstract scripting language can be developed as
well.
For me, AS3 is the key factor. If you make folks learn a new language, it
makes their set of choices much wider.
I Agree, I also think AS3 => JS is the only real option we should pursue
if we want to maintain momentum on Flex for the wider audience of Flex
developers. They don't want to write in a new language because the chance
is higher that they will not choose Flex in that case. AS3 + MXML is key,
the output can vary (JS, SWF, ..)
