It's probably worth checking into how much work it would take to get the Falcon tests donated.
Running against mustella is great and will obviously be required but I'm assuming the Falcon tests are substantially faster to execute and communicate the functionality of the code. On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > Regarding tests for Falcon, I don't know what it will take to get the tests > donated, but if we get more MXML handling working in Falcon instead (which > is under the control of this community), we can run Falcon against the full > mustella suite and find failures that way, and then mustella can serve as > another validation suite for changes to Falcon. Sure, not as good as having > unit tests, but given constraints on Gordon's time, this might be a more > productive choice.
