On 1 October 2012 13:21, Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
> Quoting Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com>: > > > >> Perhaps it would be an idea to output UML? Or would this be overkill? >> >> > > Well Roland, spitting out UML would be as easy as knowing what to spit > out. :) Is there an UML-XML spec somewhere for existing editors to be able > to load? I have used StarUML for years, so I am not to versed on the > current state of the programs. > I think this would be the best output though, at the same time it would > give a dependency graph as well. Well, I ain't no UML authority ;) But this is what is available right now about the UML spec: http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/ Perhaps worth a look? Cheers, Roland
