OK, let's start with that link. I'll take a look this evening. Alex Harui Apache Flex Team http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> -----Original Message----- > From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:07 AM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: AW: AW: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 > > Hi Alex, > > If you want I can simply send you the link to the zip with all Flex versions > in their > Mavenized form. But I would do that off the list. After all I only want to > provide > that for testing and discussion and not for real usage :-) There you could > simply > have a look at how it would look like. > > Chris > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 19:54 > An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 > > Hi Chris, > > This sounds more possible. I have some more questions: > > 1) What goes in the pom.xml? > 2) Are there any constraints on what the path is to the folder? > > Adobe just recently restructed the playerglobal archive page. The link > pattern is > now: > > http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/playergl > obal/playerglobal10_1.swc > http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/playergl > obal/playerglobal10_2.swc > > Asking them to add a whole "com/adobe/flash..." would take more convincing > than asking them to place each SWC in a folder and drop a pom.xml in it. > Then the links would look more like: > > http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/playergl > obal/10.1/playerglobal10_1.swc > http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/playergl > obal/10.2/playerglobal10_2.swc > > Or should it be: > > http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/playergl > obal/10.1/playerglobal.swc > http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/playergl > obal/10.2/playerglobal.swc > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/26/12 10:30 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" <christofer.dutz@c- > ware.de> > wrote: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > Well if Adobe would run its own repo this would be even better. I > > think you don't even have to really run a full blown Maven repo server > > for that. I think it should be enough to manually serve Maven > > artifacts with a simple Http Server. All If for example there was an > > Adobe Webserver somewhere that serves an URL like this > > > "http://some.cool.server.adobe.com/some/context/whatsoever/com/adobe/f > > lash/fra mework/playerglobal/10.1/" and inside that directory you make > > the pom xml and the playerglobal swc available for download, this > > would be equally good. Then we could add the base Url > > "http://some.cool.server.adobe.com/some/context/whatsoever/"; to our > > Maven repos and they would automatically fetch the stuff they need > > from that Adobe server. > > > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 19:21 > > An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 > > > > > > > > > > On 9/26/12 10:11 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Alex, > >> > >> Well in general it would be enough if Adobe simply published the > >> airglobal, playerglobal and osmf swcs along with their language > >> resources to a public repo ... only these 3 artifacts would be enough > >> to make us all really really happy and Apache could start officially > >> deploying Flex FDKs using maven without any legal issues. > >> > > Are there alternatives? Getting Adobe to agree to deploy to a public > > repo is probably much harder than having a separate public Adobe repo > > on an Adobe server, which is probably much harder than trying to make > > the current Adobe download pages work with Maven. > > > > I thought someone else once posted some code on this list with a > > pom.xml next to it. Isn't that the minimum requirement or is there more? > > > > What is involved in creating a "repo"? > > > >> I could even send you the prepared artifacts (Files with the correct > >> naming convention as well as the maven poms). > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 18:22 > >> An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Betreff: Re: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 9/26/12 12:18 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> If we > >>>> wanted to create maven artifacts for the official maven repo, we > >>>> certainly can't bundle in Adobe stuff, so wouldn't that require > >>>> that Adobe either publishes to the official maven repo or at > >>>> minimum puts up its own pom.xmls on its site so maven can pull the > >>>> Adobe stuff from there? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Not sure of what you're talking about, OSMF, Textlayout, or something else > ? > >>> > >> Apache Flex has TextLayout now. But OSMF, PlayerGlobal, FlashPlayer, > >> and AIR SDK will have to be downloaded from Adobe. Should Adobe be > >> doing something to make it easier for Maven to download those things? > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Harui > >> Flex SDK Team > >> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >> > > > > -- > > Alex Harui > > Flex SDK Team > > Adobe Systems, Inc. > > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
