On 3/8/12 2:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I had not realized the templates had not been donated in the first dump.
>> One concern I have is that they use SWFObject so there is an external
>> dependency there.
> SWFObject is MIT (Category A licence) so should be no issues there.
I'm looking into it now. I don't think we can check it or
PlayerProductInstall.swf into SVN, so we have some work to do first.
>
> More work for who? Me perhaps?
For me and the incubator folks who will have to clear these changes before
we can graduate. If you wait, then we know you are mucking with code that
is already cleared by Adobe.
>
> Totally agree. Any changes would have improve the template in some way for
> the better and be fully tested on a wide set of browsers and platforms.
It isn't an issue of quality, it is about legality. Changes here will have
to be reviewed for legality, not just technical merit.
>
> I would of assumed that the template wold of been part of the upcoming
> compiler donation as it's used as part of the compilation process.
>
No, it is in a different directory.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
