On 3/7/12 11:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> Why not substitute the to HTML 5 syntax format, once we have the benefit of >> utf-8 by default and some missing other tags. > Good idea. I don't see why we shouldn't update the HTML template to be more > modern. > > It would be a simple matter to give it a HTML5 doctype and the possibly one or > two other changes required. Other features (jQuery etc) can be added over > time. What does IE7 do with an HTML5 doctype? -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- re: [PROPOSAL] html template Rui Silva
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Doug Arthur
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Omar Gonzalez
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Doug Arthur
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Tony Constantinides
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Justin Mclean
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Alex Harui
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Igor Costa
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Alex Harui
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Justin Mclean
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html template Alex Harui
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html temp... Justin Mclean
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html temp... Alex Harui
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html temp... Daniel Reicher
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html temp... Justin Mclean
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html temp... Alex Harui
- Re: [PROPOSAL] html temp... Justin Mclean