Hi, > I had not realized the templates had not been donated in the first dump. > One concern I have is that they use SWFObject so there is an external > dependency there. SWFObject is MIT (Category A licence) so should be no issues there.
> IMHO, you are making more work by mucking with the templates now, but there > really isn't anything I can do to stop you. More work for who? Me perhaps? I've not changed a single line of code yet. I don't see it being any extra effort to come up with a fix now and apply that after the code has been donated. Again we are talking about changes to a single fairly simple HTML page. > We'll just have to remember to pay close attention to changes to the > template. Totally agree. Any changes would have improve the template in some way for the better and be fully tested on a wide set of browsers and platforms. If anyone does submit a patch I'll help to get it accepted but that doesn't mean I'm going to commit it straight to the trunk. :-) I would of assumed that the template wold of been part of the upcoming compiler donation as it's used as part of the compilation process. Thanks, Justin
