>Don't think I care for any type of license really... The idea is to make it >open and get some help from those who find that interesting.... I would only >have to refactor >the code and make it compliant with the latest version (I >would wait for the version 4.8 or 4.9).... I prefer putting it under Apache >Flex (as a complementary project) >than trying to make a brand out of it....
I think the risk we run with moving it under Apache Flex is that we will have 10 such frameworks all of which disagree with the other under the main project. MY personal opinion is that it really doesn't belong under Apache Flex directly, it isn't Flex. To me this is sort of a is-a versus a has-a relationship, however, that is just my opinion and certainly not final in any way. Mike
