On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 13:07, Michael A. Labriola < labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >Mike, I agree with you that the core framework should stay simple, but > maybe we could have some complementary projects don't you think? > > Without a doubt. I have developed a few of them. I fully support the idea > of having something like a gem repository, I just meant I didn't want to > see the main framework grow for all of the additions and especially since > many will be contradictory. > > Logistically though it might need to exist outside of Apache else each > project owner needs to agree with the Apache license and maintain their > code here. I bring that up as one of mine uses lgpl code, so it can never > really exist here cleanly. > Don't think I care for any type of license really... The idea is to make it open and get some help from those who find that interesting.... I would only have to refactor the code and make it compliant with the latest version (I would wait for the version 4.8 or 4.9).... I prefer putting it under Apache Flex (as a complementary project) than trying to make a brand out of it....
