On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:45, Michael A. Labriola < labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> > >Should be another project. Such as Ruby is it's own language and then you > have Ruby on Rails. > > My personal opinion is that the Flex framework should stay tight and in > the realm of a component framework. I actually wish some things were > removed. However, if we ever find a reason that a project like this cannot > exist external to the framework, some dependency or other such issue, then > we should treat that as a bug. In other words, make sure the framework can > be extensible and make sure other such projects can always exist externally > but keep the framework itself as small as possible. > Mike, I agree with you that the core framework should stay simple, but maybe we could have some complementary projects don't you think?
