> From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at] > Sent: 20 February 2012 12:04 > > The flash player caches the signed RSL's differently. [1] Not sure if I'm getting confused here, but I thought we couldn't use RSLs as Adobe won't sign them? So Apache Flex will need to be based on plain, unsigned, SWCs. Thus the browser will cache them, not the player. For security, I was suggesting that we generate and check MD5 checksums for these SWCs, thus allowing them to be served centrally, rather than on a per-host basis.
Which bit have I got wrong? David.
