On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 15:22 -0800, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > What you are proposing doesn't get you around the fact that you still have > to parse the component classes into language a target platform understands. > In other words, you can't just pawn rendering to a new target, such as the > JavaScript engine, by simply expecting Spark skin classes to create DOM > objects because the underlying component class would also have to run in > the JS engine. I wasn't suggesting Spark skin classes create DOM objects. I was proposing we write JavaScript replacements to Skin classes that would be used instead. I agree that the component classes themselves would need to be compiled to JavaScript. We therefore have two challenges: 1. Ensuring that our compiler can convert ActionScript to efficient, concise JavaScript. 2. Writing "HTML5" replacements to the component skin classes.
David.