I agree with you, but the JVM is fully open source. I didn't know the existance of the tamarin project, I will have a look to them. Thanks a lot.
2012/2/3 Jarosław Szczepankiewicz <jszczepankiew...@gmail.com> > the same is about all java ecosystem and .net ecosystem. I can not see > the difference. There is no serious alternative to Oracle Java and his > alternative OpenJDK (I know there is IBM but who uses is apart from > taking it as bonus to other software from IBM). So what's the noise > about that. I am sure that there will be (in my opinion in about 2 > years) production ready translation from flex to HTML (5?), maybe > using the external libraries like extJS maybe some brand new > components. The challenges will be in debugging such thing but that's > another story. Personally I thing that one company controlling the > player is good thing. This is multimilion investment and no free (no > income) teams can build / maintain alternative to such big apis / > technologies. > > 2012/2/3 filippo dipisa <fili...@dipisa.net>: > > Hi, > > I'm new to the list and wondering if you have ever discuss how to manage > > the fact that Flex is opensource but the Flashplayer isn't ( for my > > knowledge ) > > All the others apache project are full opensource and with full control, > so > > how this is going to work? > > What's happen if we think that we need to add a new feature to the > > flashplayer like the multithreading support for example, or something > that > > needs to be fixed or uptated to the buggy flashplayer? > > I know that Adobe at the beginning has a team dedicated to this > transition, > > but what about the future? > > Do we have always to relate to Adobe for any Flashplayer request? > > Thanks for any clarification. > > Filippo >
