I have mixed feelings about the mixed logos. I also can perceive
situations where it'd be convenient to have a "flexible" logo.
But, I also see the need--from a branding perspective--to choose one
and make it consistent. It seems--from the posts on this thread--that
more people think the latter is more important than the former. I can
respect that viewpoint and am perfectly fine getting behind that.
I never really noticed before this thread how "similar" the color
schemes are between the Google Logo and the Windows logo.
On 2/2/2012 10:36 PM, Virat Patel wrote:
+1 Superb!! looks very cool.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:44 AM, JP Bader<j...@zavteq.com> wrote:
I feel that there is a case for both the color and non-color versions.
IMO, the color version makes sense for showing a richer, more complex
project in environments like online, marketing blips, etc., while the
black and white is great for letter head or other means of discussion
(footnote).
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:50 PM, James Ong<yanlile...@gmail.com> wrote:
I still prefer the Web 2.0 colours, it make more sense and fresher as an
brighter logo for Apache Flex.
--
JP Bader
Principal
Zavteq, Inc.
@lordB8r | j...@zavteq.com
608.692.2468
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
