A disclaimer: I'm not trying to be antagonistic--I say what I say because I care about the project.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Apache Flex is about creating *useful code*, not logos. That's a flippant argument. I can appreciate wanting to move on, but the project's image is as important to its success as its code. > IMO there's two decisions left to make: > > a) Do we select one color (or combination) for the logo, or allow > multiple variants > > b) Which is the color or variant selected. I think at least the balance issue (raised by James Ong in this thread) should also be addressed. Some aspects of design are science (based on cognitive science and the way human perception works) as much as art. I'll even accept "you're crazy--the logo is perfectly balanced" or "we're intentionally going for an unbalanced logo to underscore flex themes x, y, and z," but I think saying it's just not important is a mistake.
