On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Amine Rahmouni <amine.rahmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > probably this will not please lot of people but IMHO, I think we should > discuss this further and take our time, thanks a lot for the work you’re > doing fuse, but can we just have a second thought on that please? we > shouldn't run to the vote that quick or even be afraid from thinking about > other options.
For what it's worth, I second this. I like the logo and I think it's an excellent start, but a solid logo is absolutely crucial and refining it should involve critical discussion and not just voting. For example, the multi-color version puts us really close to Chrome, Joomla, and the Windows logo; and the weights of the elements feel off (e.g., the manifold thingy dominates over the text rather than complementing it). But my point is not specific criticisms (I am not a designer); I just want to second the call to approach this more formally.
