On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > > On 1/22/12 11:48 PM, "Omar Gonzalez" <omarg.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If they're donating the > > name for us to use, and Apache will only accept the name if its under > full > > control of Apache, then I wouldn't worry about Adobe releasing a version > of > > the SDK named Adobe Flex XX.XX.XX, right? Maybe I'm opening a whole new > can > > of worms we shouldn't even think about at this point? > The can has been opened and the worms are crawling over Campos' desk :-). > There will be a non-zero but small chance of a collision. But if everyone > is willing to take that chance then 4.7 is fine with me. > > If there is a non-zero but small chance, then we should not take this route. I am sure we can reserve (if I may use that word) 4.7 for Adobe and make 4.8 the first real Apache Flex version. The whole point is to provide a way for a last release from Adobe and at the same time maintain the versioning scheme from a stability point of view when we make the transition from Adobe Flex to Apache Flex. > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
