Back to my recommendation of keeping the 'Flex Version' untouched and internal... and implementing a new 'Apache Flex Version' which is forward facing.
-- Rick Winscot On Monday, January 23, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Carol Frampton wrote: > Actually there are quite a few places the version number has to be changed. A > good candidate for cleanup. > > Carol > > Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on AT&T > > > -----Original message----- > From: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com > (mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com)> > To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org (mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org)" > <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org (mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org)> > Sent: Mon, Jan 23, 2012 05:05:19 GMT+00:00 > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide to > building the SDK (and a question)) > > Hi there, > > Also think that the Omar's version number is a better idea than year > numbering. > > Someone who's a committer will need to change the version numbers in > build_frameworks.xml: > <property name="release" value="Apache Flex 4.6.0"/> > <property name="release.version" value="4.6.0"/> > > As far as I can see nothing depends on these numbers other than the > name/version number of the SDK when imported into Flash Builder. > > Thanks, > Justin > >
