On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Campos <jonbcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org >> wrote: > >> I don't think any of this is needed. [1] states that the selected logo >> will have to be contributed according to the iCLA [2] which is >> standard for all contributions to the ASF. >> > ...Do you feel that just asking them for more info isn't needed or any of the > due diligence. I would think it important to ensure that we don't pick a > logo that is built to fit specifically for one company. But if you don't > think that is needed I can easily put my efforts into other (spoony) > avenues...
I don't mind if you want to check the logos for unwanted associations, I'd suggest reporting such remarks here if you see any, and letting voters decide if that's a problem or not. What I meant is that the iCLA covers the logo contribution adequately IMO, and it's only needed for the selected logo (and runners-up if the selected one is not contributed for some reason). -Bertrand
