On 15 January 2012 11:25, Sebastian Mohr <masul...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Bertrand > > Would there be any legal issues when using > third party Opensource libraries in these Apache > Flex code examples? > > Here are some Opensource-Microarchitectures > which are commonly used when building Flex apps: > > Cairngorm 2, Cairngorm License, MIT License ... > http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/wiki/License/ > Cairngorm 3 Libraries, Cairngorm License, MIT License ... > http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/wiki/CairngormLibraries/ > Mate, Apache License, Version 2 ... http://mate.riaforge.org/ > PureMVC, Creative Commons license ... > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses > Robotlegs, MIT License ... > https://github.com/robotlegs/robotlegs-framework/blob/version2/LICENSE > Parsley, Apache License 2.0 ... http://www.spicefactory.org/parsley/ > Spring AS, Apache Software License, Version 2.0 ... > http://www.springactionscript.org/license.html > Swiz, Apache License 2.0 ... http://swizframework.org/
MIT and Apache 2.0 licenses can both be included in Apache products. [1] PureMVC uses a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license [2] Only Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 may be included in Apache products. [3] So for this we would need to contact the Legal PMC. [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html [2] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ [3] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa - Anne
