Sorry ... me German ... here the last sentence again: If there would be a gathering of another team which could prove that building large-scale Flex apps is [also] affordable [without the usage of Microarchitectures], then, I would be happy to see their code in the Apache Flex "samples" folder.
-- Sebastian On Jan 15, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Sebastian Mohr wrote: > For the moment, I doubt that it is time- and cost-effective > build large-scale Flex apps (e.g. more then 250 MXML files) > without the use of third-party Microarchitectures. Therefore, > I would only contribute code which shows the usage with > Microarchitectures. And when a Microarchitecture needs to > be updated then the community needs to take the time to > update their code to the latest Microarchitecture version. > > If there would be a gathering of another team which could > prove that building large-scale Flex apps is affordable, too, > then, I also would be happy to see their code in the Apache > Flex "samples" folder. > > > -- Sebastian > > > > On Jan 15, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Peter Elst wrote: > >>> Would there be any legal issues when using >>> third party Opensource libraries in these Apache >>> Flex code examples? >>> >>> Here are some Opensource-Microarchitectures >> >> >> >> Can't speak to any legal issues but personally I'd prefer generic plain >> vanilla Flex code examples rather than examples of various >> microarchitectures, trying to keep those in sync as they change and ending >> up with more support questions about the third party implementations than >> the actual Flex SDK. >> >> - Peter >
