@Bertrand Would there be any legal issues when using third party Opensource libraries in these Apache Flex code examples?
Here are some Opensource-Microarchitectures which are commonly used when building Flex apps: Cairngorm 2, Cairngorm License, MIT License ... http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/wiki/License/ Cairngorm 3 Libraries, Cairngorm License, MIT License ... http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/wiki/CairngormLibraries/ Mate, Apache License, Version 2 ... http://mate.riaforge.org/ PureMVC, Creative Commons license ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses Robotlegs, MIT License ... https://github.com/robotlegs/robotlegs-framework/blob/version2/LICENSE Parsley, Apache License 2.0 ... http://www.spicefactory.org/parsley/ Spring AS, Apache Software License, Version 2.0 ... http://www.springactionscript.org/license.html Swiz, Apache License 2.0 ... http://swizframework.org/ ... I have created some code examples which I would be willing to contribute: http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/ReligionChooser ... but I am not an expert on these legal issues. -- Sebastian On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Rui Silva <f...@rduartes.net> wrote: >> ...While I'd >> expect all code in Whiteboard to result initially from TRUNK branching, the >> contents in CONTRIBS and SAMPLES could be or not.... > > I wouldn't set *any* expectation on whiteboard stuff - think of it > like a whiteboard in a conference room, you'll sometimes find drawings > of people's last vacation scene on those, and that's fine ;-) > > -Bertrand
