I agree with you, sorry I did the +3, +2 and +1 out of trying to keep
a positive outlook so logo contestants wouldn't look at a -1 and feel
like were saying there logo is below grade. I know different cultures
see things differently.
So I agree, Jonathan keeps mentioning user voice? Anybody got opinions
on that, seems like there are two options here ML or user voice.
Bertrand is it ok to use something off list?
Mike
Quoting Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com>:
On 1/12/2012 12:09 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
Hi,
1. Is voting not limited to PPMC members?
I think Voting should only be for PPMC members. I guess I give that a -1
2. Whoever votes, votes 3 times in the process described above
(order of preference) (+3(most liked), +2, +1)
This is acceptable to me, but it seems odd Seems odd not to make
our first formal vote not a +1, 0, -1 approach.
I would vote 0 here.
I had previously suggested--and I believe Bertrand said the same
thing--that we vote on each entry with a +1, 0, or -1 and then tally
them up. That way each entry will get a score. I understand that
could be tedious for the person who has to tally all votes. [I'll
take on that responsibility if we want to do it that way]. This way
something will clearly rise to the top; and every entry gets
acknowledged.
3. The votes are counted up using the group of 3s(most lovable)
first, if there is a tie, the the 2s are added up and the most 2s
wins.
I'd vote 0 here too. If we decide to do it that way, it's fine.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
