Opening the vote to the community is a nice gesture... but it would probably be easier if we consider PPMC / initial commiters as contest judges who's decision is final.
Consider the recent debacle in New Hampshire... the 'hanging chad' and so-forth. I would hate to see this turn into a mob or a tea-party. -- Rick Winscot On Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Hi, > > In light of this logo contest I have been wanting to do this. > > The vote will last for 72 hours and voted on by existing PPMC > members(binding). > > This is my suggestion; > > To make this simple as Bertrand has suggested; > > Each member gets 3 votes which are a +3, +2, +1, there is no need to > use -1, just vote for the 3 logos +3 being your favorite. > > Items for agreement; > > > 1. Is voting not limited to PPMC members? > > 2. Whoever votes, votes 3 times in the process described above (order > of preference) (+3(most liked), +2, +1) > > 3. The votes are counted up using the group of 3s(most lovable) first, > if there is a tie, the the 2s are added up and the most 2s wins. > > PPMC members please vote on the above 3 items. > > I will submit a list of entries and that list will be voted on by the > agreement defined in the above the list items. > > Make sense? If you do not give a +1 to each entry (except #1), if > explain your alternative. > > Mike
