I played with it a little bit in the last hour. The result are too unfortunate to show them. I guess it looked better in my mind than on (virtual) paper.
Claudiu ________________________________ From: Sebastian Mohr <masul...@gmail.com> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [Logo] Sebastian Mohr I just liked the feather on the letter ... This logo implies to me "Safety" for Flex ... because the feather (Apache) is covering (or protecting) Flex. As I have mentioned before, "Stability over Philosophy" should be the credo the new logo, and Flex doesn't need to be reinvented because "Flex is still Flex, and, now even better managed by Apache". Feel free to grab the idea and improve it. -- Sebastian On Jan 12, 2012, at 10:43 AM, claudiu ursica wrote: > I already +1 a different logo so I guess I cannot +1 this one. However I > like it. > > Do you think integrating the feather as part of the X letter might make it > more distinct or is just to cheesy (even make the feather black and white)? > > C > > > > ________________________________ > From: Abhilash Krishnan <abhilashk....@gmail.com> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:34 AM > Subject: Re: [Logo] Sebastian Mohr > > I would +1 this logo. This logo clearly means "Flex is Apachised" i.e > Apache Flex. It depicts the purpose of Apache behind Flex and it will be a > differentiation from Adobe Flex. Taking into account of other Apache > projects this logo will add another feather into Apache Kitty. +1 from my > side. > > Disclaimer: I am not an expert in Apache Branding. > > Abhilash > > On 12 January 2012 03:27, Sebastian Mohr <masul...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ok, one more try ... I have added another Apache Flex >> logo which should be free of any infringements (I hope): >> >> http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/ApacheFlexLogoProposal >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> -- Sebastian >> >> >> On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:55 AM, Stephane Beladaci wrote: >> >>> which is a good thing I believe, recycling the existing logo would >>> also create confusion, it would be saying "it is still Adobe Flex, we >>> just Apached it" when in fact we need to send the message that this is >>> not Adobe at all anymore. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> Adobe is not going to transfer rights to the logo to Apache, so all new >> logo >>>> designs should not borrow from the current Flex logo or any other Adobe >> logo >>>> (or anybody else's trademarked logo for that matter). >>
