On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:25 PM Mark Filipak <markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28/05/2025 16.33, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > > On 5/28/2025 12:00 PM, Mark Filipak wrote: > > > >> By continuing to carry obsolete filters, FFmpeg emasculates itself. > > > > How? > > Developers have to dream up new names because what they are doing, what > they are writing, has a > name, but that name has already been used. So, they invent a new name that > doesn't really apply, > that nobody knows, and that nobody can figure out. > > > There are probably extremely few instances where a name would rationally > be reused; > > Name even a single such instance, Carl. Name reuse to a better filter > could be covered by the > documentation. > Your mission is failed. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
