On 28/05/2025 17.28, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:25 PM Mark Filipak <markfilipak.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 28/05/2025 16.33, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 5/28/2025 12:00 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
By continuing to carry obsolete filters, FFmpeg emasculates itself.
How?
Developers have to dream up new names because what they are doing, what
they are writing, has a
name, but that name has already been used. So, they invent a new name that
doesn't really apply,
that nobody knows, and that nobody can figure out.
There are probably extremely few instances where a name would rationally
be reused;
Name even a single such instance, Carl. Name reuse to a better filter
could be covered by the
documentation.
Your mission is failed.
My challenge was to Carl.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
