Andriy Gelman: > On Sun, 05. Apr 10:34, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 03:30 Uhr schrieb Andriy Gelman >> <andriy.gel...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> On Sun, 05. Apr 02:05, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>>> Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 01:02 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos >>>> <ceffm...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> Am Sa., 4. Apr. 2020 um 00:44 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos >>>>> <ceffm...@gmail.com>: >> >>>>>> New patch attached, it should now only change the telecined >>>>>> frames and leave the other frames as they are, the setfield >>>>>> filter can be used to force a progressive setting for them. >>>>> >>>>> New patch attached that also sets top_field_first >>>> >>>> Which had the effect that fate is correct again, new patch attached. >>> >>> FYI >>> Currently patchwork does some filtering on the subject line to understand >>> when >>> an attachment in a reply-to message is a new version of a patch. >>> >>> If you would like patchwork to treat the attachment as a new version, then >>> pls remove the "Re: " in the subject line of the reply message. This will >>> create >>> a new entry for the patch. >>> Otherwise the reply is treated as part of the existing thread. > >> >> All revisions of the patch in this thread were picked up and processed >> by patchwork. >> (Sorry if I misunderstood your mail) > > I did this manually myself :) (i.e. removed "Re: " from subject line and > reparsed the emails in patchwork) > Thanks for all the work you put into patchwork, Andriy. Much appreciated.
- Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
