Hi!
Attached patch marks actually telecined frames as interlaced,
other frames as progressive.
Please comment, Carl Eugen
From 97f3bba7b4f4f4bf4bbb69376daeb45e3386ba62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 23:04:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] lavfi/telecine: Mark telecined frames as interlaced.
---
libavfilter/vf_telecine.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_telecine.c b/libavfilter/vf_telecine.c
index 62599a7a3a..3e65f08e39 100644
--- a/libavfilter/vf_telecine.c
+++ b/libavfilter/vf_telecine.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink, AVFrame *inpicref)
s->stride[i],
(s->planeheight[i] - !s->first_field + 1) / 2);
}
+ s->frame[nout]->interlaced_frame = 1;
nout++;
len--;
s->occupied = 0;
@@ -220,6 +221,7 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink, AVFrame *inpicref)
inpicref->data[i], inpicref->linesize[i],
s->stride[i],
s->planeheight[i]);
+ s->frame[nout]->interlaced_frame = 0;
nout++;
len -= 2;
}
@@ -236,6 +238,7 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink, AVFrame *inpicref)
for (i = 0; i < nout; i++) {
AVFrame *frame = av_frame_clone(s->frame[i]);
+ int interlaced = frame->interlaced_frame;
if (!frame) {
av_frame_free(&inpicref);
@@ -243,6 +246,7 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink, AVFrame *inpicref)
}
av_frame_copy_props(frame, inpicref);
+ frame->interlaced_frame = interlaced;
frame->pts = ((s->start_time == AV_NOPTS_VALUE) ? 0 : s->start_time) +
av_rescale(outlink->frame_count_in, s->ts_unit.num,
s->ts_unit.den);
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
