Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 03:30 Uhr schrieb Andriy Gelman <andriy.gel...@gmail.com>: > > On Sun, 05. Apr 02:05, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 01:02 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos > > <ceffm...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Am Sa., 4. Apr. 2020 um 00:44 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos > > > <ceffm...@gmail.com>:
> > > > New patch attached, it should now only change the telecined > > > > frames and leave the other frames as they are, the setfield > > > > filter can be used to force a progressive setting for them. > > > > > > New patch attached that also sets top_field_first > > > > Which had the effect that fate is correct again, new patch attached. > > FYI > Currently patchwork does some filtering on the subject line to understand when > an attachment in a reply-to message is a new version of a patch. > > If you would like patchwork to treat the attachment as a new version, then > pls remove the "Re: " in the subject line of the reply message. This will > create > a new entry for the patch. > Otherwise the reply is treated as part of the existing thread. All revisions of the patch in this thread were picked up and processed by patchwork. (Sorry if I misunderstood your mail) Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
