> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of > Carl Eugen Hoyos > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:06 AM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/filter-video.mak: do not use > bit-exact > check for dnn_processing > > Am Fr., 17. Jan. 2020 um 15:37 Uhr schrieb Guo, Yejun <yejun....@intel.com>: > > > > the reason is that the tested models are in float format > > The two reference files are ~1MB together: Do we want / need that? > (No opinion here.)
how about just keeping one test (for format rgb24) for vf_dnn_processing? The rgb format might be the most popular format for vf_dnn_processing. And the test has two materials: 1) fate-suite/dnn_processing/dnn_rgb_processing.model (can be renamed from halve_first_channel_float.model, 184 byte now) 2) fate-suite/filter-reference/dnn_rgb_processing.raw (can be renamed from dnn_processing-halve_first_channel_float.raw, 446KB now) When we support more models (the most effort is to add more dnn layers in native mode), I can update both dnn_rgb_processing.model (the file size will be increased bit by bit) and dnn_rgb_processing.raw (the file size will not change much). > > Carl Eugen > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
