Hi, On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:05 AM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > > Kyle Swanson (12019-01-11): > > Lots of people get paid to work on OSS. It's not a conspiracy, that's > > just the way it is. If someone gets paid to write a patch that does > > something useful, great. They got paid, and FFmpeg is better. If > > someone gets paid to write a patch that's no good, we just don't merge > > it. I don't see any reason FFmpeg should be concerned who is getting > > paid and how much. > > I agree with that. Only you are suggesting a "conspiracy".
Sorry, bad word choice. > > I am not suggesting we ban people from getting paid, I am not leading a > "witch hunt", I only advocate for transparency and honesty. > > Are you against transparency and honesty? > > On the other hand, I have observed in the past patches that were of poor > quality and suspected they were the result of sponsorships. I would like > to know. Would you not? If someone sends a bad patch, we have no obligation to merge it. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel Thanks, Kyle _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
