On 11/01/2019 18:21, Nicolas George wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>
> ---
> doc/developer.texi | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Rather than repeat myself, I'll refer to my previous mails:
* http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-January/238740.html
* http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-January/238743.html
I utterly and absolutely think no good will come from such a policy. It's
divisive, exclusionary, inflamatory, witch-hunt-y, and privacy invading,
among other things.
I'm speechless. Words cannot describe how terrible I think such a policy is
for current and future contributors, and I am of the opinion that adopting
such a policy would see any work sent to FFmpeg by anyone involved in a
company, which I may add, is a lot, utterly dry up.
I've not much more to say on the matter, and I will not engage in flame
wars after.
- Derek
(P.S. Just how do you intend to enforce this? How do you prove/disprove someone
has been paid in some form, directly, or indiectly? Do you just accuse them on
the list?)
(P.P.S. I am aware my opinions hold little clout here nowadays, so take my
response
as you will.)
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
