On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 18:38, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/01/2019 18:21, Nicolas George wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> > > --- > > doc/developer.texi | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > Rather than repeat myself, I'll refer to my previous mails: > > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-January/238740.html > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-January/238743.html > > I utterly and absolutely think no good will come from such a policy. It's > divisive, exclusionary, inflamatory, witch-hunt-y, and privacy invading, > among other things. > > I'm speechless. Words cannot describe how terrible I think such a policy is > for current and future contributors, and I am of the opinion that adopting > such a policy would see any work sent to FFmpeg by anyone involved in a > company, which I may add, is a lot, utterly dry up. > > I've not much more to say on the matter, and I will not engage in flame > wars after. > > - Derek > > (P.S. Just how do you intend to enforce this? How do you prove/disprove > someone > has been paid in some form, directly, or indiectly? Do you just accuse > them on > the list?) > > (P.P.S. I am aware my opinions hold little clout here nowadays, so take my > response > as you will.) > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel I fully agree. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
