On 11/01/2019 16:23, Nicolas George wrote: > Derek Buitenhuis (12019-01-11): >> Irrelevant to whether a patch is acceptable or not to FFmpeg. > > In theory, it is, and it should be. > > In practice, I have several times suspected a sponsored work was the > reason behind cutting corners, poor design and future planning, bad > reception of review comments, etc. A mandatory disclosure would make > these bad behaviours obvious.
I'm sorry, but this just reeks of "your motives aren't pure enough for us to trust you" partisanship, which is, frankly, disgusting. > I will produce a patch on the developer policy to start a real > discussion. I suspect the replies will not reflect what you think they will, but if it is the only way... so be it. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
