Derek Buitenhuis (12019-01-11): > Irrelevant to whether a patch is acceptable or not to FFmpeg.
In theory, it is, and it should be. In practice, I have several times suspected a sponsored work was the reason behind cutting corners, poor design and future planning, bad reception of review comments, etc. A mandatory disclosure would make these bad behaviours obvious. I will produce a patch on the developer policy to start a real discussion. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
