On 11/01/2019 15:26, Nicolas George wrote: > Carl Eugen Hoyos (12019-01-11): >> The original unfinished demuxer was posted to the development >> mailing list: >> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2010-January/086658.html > > Ah, good to know. Still, Paul made efforts to resurrect that patch, I > wonder if these efforts were sponsored, and in that case what the > sponsor thinks about them staying unfinished, or if they were not, and > in that case why expect payment for the final efforts.
Irrelevant to whether a patch is acceptable or not to FFmpeg. > More generally, I think it would be a good practice that any submission > that is sponsored is clearly marked as such: identity of the sponsor, > amount, identity of the recipient(s). Why and to what end? Seems like a great way to witchhunt specific patches. Also, nobody has ANY business knowing what someone else is paid if they don't want to supply that info. None at all. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
