On 5/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-05-23 0:21 GMT+02:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 2018-05-22 17:40 GMT+02:00, Gagandeep Singh <deepgagan231...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> + low = s->plane[plane].subband[0];
>>>> + high = s->plane[plane].subband[8];
>>>> + output = s->plane[plane].l_h[6];
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < lowpass_width; i++) {
>>>> + vert_filter(output, lowpass_width, low, lowpass_width,
>>>> high, highpass_stride, lowpass_height);
>>>> + low++;
>>>> + high++;
>>>> + output++;
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> - low = s->plane[plane].subband[0];
>>>> - high = s->plane[plane].subband[8];
>>>> - output = s->plane[plane].l_h[6];
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < lowpass_width; i++) {
>>>> - vert_filter(output, lowpass_width, low, lowpass_width,
>>>> high,
>>>> highpass_stride, lowpass_height);
>>>> - low++;
>>>> - high++;
>>>> - output++;
>>>> - }
>>>
>>> The patch will get much more readable (and easier to review)
>>> if you do not re-indent, instead send a second patch with the
>>> cosmetic changes only.
>>>
>>
>> Except, no sane developer works like that.
>
> It's great to know that you are so much smarter than most developers,
> I will forward the next regression directly to you to fix it.
CoC violation. First warning given.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
