2018-05-23 0:21 GMT+02:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> 2018-05-22 17:40 GMT+02:00, Gagandeep Singh <deepgagan231...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> + low = s->plane[plane].subband[0];
>>> + high = s->plane[plane].subband[8];
>>> + output = s->plane[plane].l_h[6];
>>> + for (i = 0; i < lowpass_width; i++) {
>>> + vert_filter(output, lowpass_width, low, lowpass_width,
>>> high, highpass_stride, lowpass_height);
>>> + low++;
>>> + high++;
>>> + output++;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - low = s->plane[plane].subband[0];
>>> - high = s->plane[plane].subband[8];
>>> - output = s->plane[plane].l_h[6];
>>> - for (i = 0; i < lowpass_width; i++) {
>>> - vert_filter(output, lowpass_width, low, lowpass_width, high,
>>> highpass_stride, lowpass_height);
>>> - low++;
>>> - high++;
>>> - output++;
>>> - }
>>
>> The patch will get much more readable (and easier to review)
>> if you do not re-indent, instead send a second patch with the
>> cosmetic changes only.
>>
>
> Except, no sane developer works like that.
It's great to know that you are so much smarter than most developers,
I will forward the next regression directly to you to fix it.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
