On 3 May 2018 at 00:10, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > On 2 May 2018 at 21:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 2018-05-02 5:35 GMT+02:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: > > > > On 1 May 2018 at 21:58, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> 2018-05-01 21:00 GMT+02:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov < > atomnu...@gmail.com>: > > > >> > Its a reminder of a bygone era. Less flexible than the internal RC > > > >> > system, probably worse and most definitely broken. Drop it. No one > > > >> > ever used it either, except for mislead people. > > > >> > > > >> Sorry for my bad git knowledge: > > > >> Is the above part of the commit message? > > > >> > > > >> Carl Eugen > > > > > > > Yep, its part of the commit message. > > > > > > Then the patch cannot be committed as-is. > > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > > > > Please wait for a comment from the maintainer, Carl Eugen > The commit message is (unnecessarily) offensive. > There's nothing offensive in there. Users are mislead because this option exists because they think it'll give them better quality. It doesn't. About the removial itself, its a question if theres someone who > used/ wants to use this and wants to continue to use it. > (thats something i do not know) > No one wanted to use it in the first place. I certainly can look into fixing it if theres someone who uses this. In fact > i was not aware of this being broken, but i think i havnt tested it for a > long > time so it very well could be broken. > > If OTOH noone uses / wants to use it then well there wouldnt be much point > in keeping it > Removed the commit message altogether. I plan to apply this tomorrow unless there are objections. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
