On 2 May 2018 at 21:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-05-02 5:35 GMT+02:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: > > On 1 May 2018 at 21:58, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> 2018-05-01 21:00 GMT+02:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: > >> > Its a reminder of a bygone era. Less flexible than the internal RC > >> > system, probably worse and most definitely broken. Drop it. No one > >> > ever used it either, except for mislead people. > >> > >> Sorry for my bad git knowledge: > >> Is the above part of the commit message? > >> > >> Carl Eugen > > > Yep, its part of the commit message. > > Then the patch cannot be committed as-is. >
Why? > Please wait for a comment from the maintainer, Carl Eugen > So if the maintainer approves I can commit as is? Your previous sentence makes no sense at all as you're not the maintainer nor did you even explain what's wrong with it. Neither can I, as every statement in that commit message is truthful. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
