2018-05-02 23:23 GMT+02:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: > On 2 May 2018 at 21:19, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2018-05-02 5:35 GMT+02:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: >> > On 1 May 2018 at 21:58, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> 2018-05-01 21:00 GMT+02:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: >> >> > Its a reminder of a bygone era. Less flexible than the internal RC >> >> > system, probably worse and most definitely broken. Drop it. No one >> >> > ever used it either, except for mislead people. >> >> >> >> Sorry for my bad git knowledge: >> >> Is the above part of the commit message? >> >> >> >> Carl Eugen >> >> > Yep, its part of the commit message. >> >> Then the patch cannot be committed as-is. >> > > Why? > > > >> Please wait for a comment from the maintainer, Carl Eugen >> > > So if the maintainer approves I can commit as is?
No, of course not, the commit message is offensive. Just remove the "reasoning". Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
